+更多
专家名录
唐朱昌
唐朱昌
教授,博士生导师。复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心首任主任,复旦大学俄...
严立新
严立新
复旦大学国际金融学院教授,中国反洗钱研究中心执行主任,陆家嘴金...
陈浩然
陈浩然
复旦大学法学院教授、博士生导师;复旦大学国际刑法研究中心主任。...
何 萍
何 萍
华东政法大学刑法学教授,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员,荷...
李小杰
李小杰
安永金融服务风险管理、咨询总监,曾任蚂蚁金服反洗钱总监,复旦大学...
周锦贤
周锦贤
周锦贤先生,香港人,广州暨南大学法律学士,复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中...
童文俊
童文俊
高级经济师,复旦大学金融学博士,复旦大学经济学博士后。现供职于中...
汤 俊
汤 俊
武汉中南财经政法大学信息安全学院教授。长期专注于反洗钱/反恐...
李 刚
李 刚
生辰:1977.7.26 籍贯:辽宁抚顺 民族:汉 党派:九三学社 职称:教授 研究...
祝亚雄
祝亚雄
祝亚雄,1974年生,浙江衢州人。浙江师范大学经济与管理学院副教授,博...
顾卿华
顾卿华
复旦大学中国反洗钱研究中心特聘研究员;现任安永管理咨询服务合伙...
张平
张平
工作履历:曾在国家审计署从事审计工作,是国家第一批政府审计师;曾在...
转发
上传时间: 2025-02-19      浏览次数:283次
Texas Judge Clears Way for Anti-Money Laundering Law’s Enforcement

 

https://www.ainvest.com/news/texas-judge-clears-anti-money-laundering-law-enforcement-2502/

 

A federal judge in Texas has lifted a nationwide injunction that had temporarily blocked the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), paving the way for the anti-money laundering law to take effect. The CTA, passed in 2021, requires certain legal entities to disclose their beneficial owners to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), aiming to combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and other financial crimes.

 

The injunction, issued in December 2024 by Judge Amos L. Mazzant III of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, had halted the enforcement of the CTA nationwide. However, the U.S. Supreme Court recently granted the government's motion to stay the injunction, allowing the CTA's enforcement to resume.

 

The CTA represents a significant improvement to the U.S. anti-money laundering (AML) framework, as it closes a regulatory blindspot that has contributed to the U.S.'s status as a haven for hiding and laundering ill-gotten gains. By requiring companies to reveal their true owners, the CTA aims to peel back the layers of anonymity that often enable financial crimes.

 

However, the enforcement of the CTA faces several challenges, as evidenced by the ongoing legal challenges and injunctions. Some of these challenges include constitutional concerns, administrative burden, privacy concerns, and the potential for an uneven competitive landscape.

 

Critics argue that the CTA exceeds Congress's constitutional authority to regulate interstate and foreign commerce, as it applies to all incorporated entities regardless of their commercial activity. Small businesses may face difficulties in complying with the CTA's reporting requirements, which could impose an undue burden on their operations. The collection and storage of beneficial ownership information may raise privacy concerns, as it could potentially be misused or accessed by unauthorized parties. Companies that have already invested in compliance efforts may feel at a disadvantage compared to those who delay preparations, potentially widening the gap between organizations based on their readiness to meet future obligations.

 

Despite these challenges, the enforcement of the CTA is a crucial step in improving the U.S. AML framework and combating financial crimes. The CTA's supporters argue that the benefits of increased transparency outweigh the compliance costs, and that the law is a routine and necessary exercise of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause.

 

As the CTA's enforcement resumes, businesses should remain vigilant and prepare for potential future obligations. Monitoring regulatory updates, conducting ownership reviews, and developing compliance processes will help these businesses stay ahead of any changes in the regulatory environment.